Consistency of performance is a primary basis for any sport. If you’ve wondered why it isn’t possible for the human brain to tune itself such that it can repeatedly perform a task with near-perfect consistency, the explanation to that is now out. There would perhaps be a minimal competitive advantage in sport if our brains could learn to perform consistently - for mere practice would help achieve a perfect strike each time we bowl, or hit the bulls-eye at every game of darts (assuming external factors remain constant).
The reason for this, as a Stanford study suggests, is that the human brain has to start from scratch each time a movement is planned. Our neurons are not wired to retain and adapt to repetitive motion as was previously conceived, and muscles are to blame for less than half of the mechanical inconsistencies observed during movement.
As Krishna Shenoy, study co-author and assistant professor of electrical engineering at Stanford University, puts it, “The main reason you can’t move the same way each time, such as swinging a golf club, is that your brain can’t plan the swing the same way each time.”
According to study co-author and postdoctoral researcher Mark Churchland, “The nervous system was not designed to do the same thing over and over again. The nervous system was designed to be flexible. You typically find yourself doing things you’ve never done before.”
As the study results demonstrate, “effect magnitudes were such that at least half of the observed movement variability likely had its source during motor preparation. Thus, even for a highly practiced task, the ability to repeatedly plan the same movement limits our ability to repeatedly execute the same movement.”
If motion validation at the neural level were possible, I wonder if this would help eliminate the partial responsibility that muscles have on the accuracy of movement. It would be very interesting to research this aspect further, as I’m sure many research groups are. At the very least, it would be of tremendous help in alleviating motion inconsistencies in debilitating diseases.
Link: BBC Article
Abstract, Neuron, Volume 52, Issue 6 , 21 December 2006, Pages 1085-1096